7_4_policy
Key Features
Multi-Level Earnings
- 3 levels deep (A → B → C)
TVL-Based Tiers
- 5 tiers (Basic → Legend) based on Total Value Locked
TVL Calculation:
- Your deposits + All Level A deposits + All Level B deposits + All Level C deposits
Lifetime Attribution
- No time limits, no caps
Flexible Allocation
- Adjust % between levels (Pro+ tiers)
NFT Transferability
- Sell your affiliate network as an asset
All Revenue Sources
- Cards, swaps, staking, bridges, on/off-ramp
Tier Structure
| Tier | TVL Range | Level A | Level B | Level C | Total Max | Flexible |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic | $0-$10k | 10% | — | — | 10% | No |
| Premium | $10k-$100k | 15% | — | — | 15% | No |
| Pro | $100k-$1M | 20% | 5% | — | 25% | ±2 pts |
| VIP | $1M-$10M | 22% | 6% | 2% | 30% | ±4 pts |
| Legend | $10M+ | 25% | 10% | 5% | 40% | ±6 pts |
Fee Policy and Discounts
Core Pricing Philosophy
OROKAI's fee structure is designed to be transparent, competitive, and adjustable based on user activity and token holdings. This section outlines our pricing philosophy, discount mechanisms, and future token utility features.
General principles
Transparency First
- All fees shown BEFORE user signs transaction
- Breakdown available (network, protocol, OROKAI)
- No hidden charges, no surprise deductions
Value-Based Pricing
- Fees reflect value provided (orchestration, AI, UX)
- Higher complexity = higher fee (migration vs simple swap)
- Comparable to alternatives (not lowest, but best value)
Adjustable & Fair
- OROKAI may adjust fees with 30-day notice
- Market-competitive (we monitor competitor pricing)
Current Fee Schedule (Summary)
Quick Reference Table
On-Chain Operations
| Activity | Base Fee | OROKAI Share |
|---|---|---|
| DEX Swap | LP fee (0.05-1%) | 25% of LP fee |
| Bridge | Protocol (0.001-0.05%) | 50% of protocol |
| Staking (auto-claim) | 8% of claimed | Full 8% |
| Gas (all operations) | Network cost | +10% markup |
Fiat Operations
| Activity | Base Fee | OROKAI Share |
|---|---|---|
| On-Ramp | Provider (~3%) | 0.3% fixed |
| Off-Ramp | Provider (~3%) | 0.3% fixed |
| Card Transactions | V Plus Pay (2.2%+) | 0.3% fixed |
Growth Programs
| Activity | Base Fee | OROKAI Share |
|---|---|---|
| Affiliate | User pays nothing | We share revenue |
| Token Utility | Varies [TBD] | Discount/rebate |
Fee Adjustment Policy
When and how OROKAI may change fees (Triggers for Fee Review)
Quarterly Review Cycle:
- Competitor pricing analysis
- Infrastructure cost changes
- User feedback & usage patterns
- Market conditions (bear vs bull)
- Regulatory requirements
Ad-Hoc Reviews (if needed):
- Major partner fee changes (e.g., V Plus Pay adjusts pricing)
- Protocol cost changes (e.g., DEX increases LP fees)
- Significant infrastructure cost spikes
- Emergency adjustments (rare)
Process
1. Internal Analysis (OROKAI team)
├─ Data review (costs, revenue, usage)
├─ Competitive benchmarking
└─ Impact modeling (how users affected)
2. Proposal (if adjustment needed)
├─ Draft new fee schedule
├─ Document rationale
└─ Estimate user impact
3. Notification (30-day minimum notice)
├─ In-app announcement
├─ Blog post with explanation
└─ FAQ for questions
4. Community Input (optional, if governance active)
├─ Discussion period (14 days)
├─ Feedback collection
└─ Adjustment if needed
5. Implementation
├─ After 30+ days notice
├─ Clear date communicated
└─ Old fees grandfathered briefly (7 days overlap)
Token Utility
OROKAI Token Fee Discounts
This section describes planned token utility. Actual implementation depends on token launch (see Chapter Token and Blockchain for full tokenomics).
Mechanism: Hold/stake OROKAI tokens → Reduce fees
Proposed Structure [TBD]:
Token Utility Beyond Fee Discounts [TBD]
Potential additional benefits for token holders:
1. Priority Features
├─ Early access to new protocols/chains
├─ Beta features (test before public launch)
└─ Exclusive AI strategies (Legend tier only)
2. Enhanced Limits
├─ Higher transaction limits (on/off-ramp)
├─ Faster payouts (affiliate/rebates)
└─ Lower minimum thresholds
3. Governance Rights (if enabled)
├─ Vote on fee adjustments
├─ Vote on protocol integrations (allow-list)
├─ Vote on feature priorities
└─ Influence roadmap (community input)
4. Premium Support
├─ Dedicated support channel
├─ Faster response times (SLA)
└─ Priority dispute resolution
5. Exclusive Events
├─ Token holder AMAs with team
├─ Early notifications (new partnerships)
└─ Access to OROKAI meetups/conferences
Fee Policy Governance [Future - TBD]
If/when token governance is enabled
Community can vote on:
├─ Fee adjustments (increase/decrease)
├─ Discount tier thresholds (should Tier 2 be 10k or 15k tokens?)
└─ New discount mechanisms (introduce subscriptions?)
Voting power based on:
├─ Token holdings (1 token = 1 vote, OR quadratic voting)
├─ Stake duration (longer lock = more voting weight)
└─ Platform activity (active users get bonus votes)
Proposal process:
1. Community member submits proposal
2. Formal proposal (on-chain, requires X token threshold)
3. Voting period (7-14 days)
4. Execution (if approved by majority/supermajority)
5. Implementation (30-day notice if fee increase)
Limitations:
├─ Can't vote to eliminate all fees (unsustainable)
├─ Can't vote for discounts >50% (breaks economics)
└─ Core team retains veto (for safety, temporary)
Status: [TBD] - Depends on token launch and decentralization roadmap.
Summary: Fee Philosophy
OROKAI's approach to fees:
Transparency
- Users always know what they're paying and why
Competitiveness
- Fees comparable to alternatives (not lowest, but fair)
Value-Based
- Higher fees for higher-value features
Loyalty Rewarded (future)
- Token holders and high-volume users get discounts
Sustainability
- Fees must cover costs + development + growth
Community-Driven (future)
- Users can influence fee policy via governance
Adjustable but Stable -Can change fees, but not frequently or drastically
Goal: Create a fee structure that is fair, transparent, and sustainable while rewarding loyal users and token holders.