Skip to main content

Risks and Mitigations (Summary)

Risk Categories and Responses

Technical risks

RiskLikelihoodImpactMitigation
Smart contract exploitLowCritical• 2 independent audits
• Bug bounty program
• Emergency pause mechanism
• Insurance fund reserves
• Gradual rollout (limit TVL exposure)
Bridge failure/exploitMediumHigh• Allow-list vetted bridges only
• Health monitoring + quarantine
• Multi-provider redundancy
• User warnings before bridging
• Kill-switch per bridge
RPC provider outageMediumHigh• Multi-provider setup (3+ RPC nodes)
• Automatic failover
• Circuit breakers
• Self-hosted backup nodes
DEX liquidity crisisMediumMedium• Route through multiple DEXs
• Real-time liquidity checks
• Slippage warnings
• Fallback to alternative DEXs
Database failure/data lossLowCritical• Daily backups (automated)
• Multi-region replication
• Point-in-time recovery
• Disaster recovery drills (quarterly)
Scaling bottlenecksMediumMedium• Load testing before growth phases
• Horizontal scaling architecture
• CDN for static assets
• Database read replicas
AI model hallucinationsMediumMedium• Conservative recommendations
• Human review of outputs (sampling)
• User feedback loop ("report bad advice")
• Model versioning + rollback

Operational risks

RiskLikelihoodImpactMitigation
Key person dependencyMediumHigh• Document tribal knowledge
• Cross-train team members
• Succession planning
• Retention incentives (equity)
Team attritionMediumHigh• Competitive compensation
• Strong culture + mission
• Career development paths
• Hire pipeline (always recruiting)
Partner exits (Stripe, V Plus Pay)LowHigh• Multiple provider agreements
• Contractual lock-in periods
• Migration plans documented
• Backup partners identified
Support overwhelmMediumMedium• Self-service docs (reduce tickets)
• Chatbot for common issues
• Tiered support (L1/L2/L3)
• Scale support team with users
Infrastructure costs spikeMediumMedium• Volume discounts negotiated
• Cost monitoring + alerts
• Optimize queries/caching
• Budget contingency (20%)
Security breach (internal)LowCritical• Background checks (employees)
• Least-privilege access
• Audit logs (all actions)
• Regular security training

Regulatory risks

RiskLikelihoodImpactMitigation
Non-custodial model challengedLowCritical• Legal opinions pre-launch
• Compliance-by-design
• Clear user disclosures
• Separate entities if needed (US/offshore)
Affiliate program deemed pyramidLowHigh• Legal review of structure
• Revenue from real activity (not recruitment)
• No upfront costs to join
• Clear disclosures (variable earnings)
Token classified as securityMediumCritical• Legal opinions (multiple jurisdictions)
• Utility-first design
• No promises of returns
• Delay/cancel TGE if necessary
DeFi protocol regulatory actionMediumHigh• Diversify protocol integrations
• Monitor regulatory news
• Quick removal of flagged protocols
• Geo-block where required
Sanctions/AML violationLowCritical• Partner KYC/AML (Stripe, V Plus Pay)
• Geo-restrictions enforced
• No mixing/privacy features
• Compliance team monitoring
Jurisdiction-specific banMediumHigh• Operate in multiple jurisdictions
• Entity structure flexibility
• Prepared to geo-block
• Focus on permissive markets

Market & Competitive Risks

RiskLikelihoodImpactMitigation
Low user adoptionMediumCritical• MVP testing (validate PMF)
• Iterate based on feedback
• Flexible roadmap (pivot if needed)
• Marketing diversification
High user churnMediumHigh• Onboarding optimization
• Engagement features (notifications, insights)
• Network effects (affiliate ties users)
• Monitor NPS, act on feedback
Competitor launches similar productHighMedium• Speed to market (first-mover advantage)
• Unique features (NFT transferability, AI)
• Strong brand/community
• Continuous innovation
Bear market (crypto winter)MediumHigh• Diversified revenue (not just yield-seeking)
• Card + fiat useful in bear markets
• Extend runway (conservative burn)
• Focus on retention over acquisition
DeFi yields collapseMediumHigh• Not solely yield-dependent
• Value prop = convenience, not "best APY"
• Expand to non-yield features (cards, swaps)
• Messaging adjustment (safety over yield)
Partner increases feesMediumMedium• Contractual fee caps (where possible)
• Multi-provider strategy
• Pass-through costs (transparent to users)
• Renegotiate or switch partners
Multi-layered risk management

OROKAI addresses risks at technical, operational, and regulatory levels through proactive controls, clear communication, and strategic partnerships.